Change Is Hard, So Is Standing Still
Picture a patient—call her Sarah—sitting in a therapy room, a smartphone on the table, its screen glowing with a memory app she’s meant to use. Her brow furrows as she hesitates, caught between the effort it demands and the comfort of letting it sit. The clinician beside her waits, sensing the potential in that small device—a bridge to independence—but also the pull of her doubt. Brain injury rehabilitation lives in these moments: change is hard, so is standing still. For Sarah, the next step might be hers to take, but for others, it’s not—geography, resources, or the injury itself can decide before she does. As clinicians, we walk this intricate path with them, in a space that’s rarely starkly divided, but a wide, shifting grey.
The Cost of Change: Effort and Evolution
Change is the pulse of brain injury rehab—rebuilding skills, embracing tools like apps or planners, and guiding patients toward a redefined sense of self. It’s a journey that asks a lot. Physically, it might mean the exhaustion of practicing a task repeatedly, like relearning to sequence a morning routine after a brain injury. Emotionally, it’s the ache of facing a new reality—perhaps a once-sharp mind now grappling with fog. Cognitively, it’s the stretch of adapting—say, using a voice-activated assistant to manage appointments when memory falters.
Yet, change has a quiet promise: it evolves. Over months or years, what starts as a struggle can become second nature. Neuroplasticity underpins this—Kleim and Jones (2008) show how repetition carves new neural pathways, turning fumbling efforts into fluid habits. Picture a patient wrestling with a speech app for weeks, then later using it effortlessly to chat with a friend, a grin breaking through. The burden lightens—sometimes physically, as tasks grow easier, sometimes emotionally, as acceptance or pride takes root. Consider a case where someone shifts from resisting a career change to embracing a slower-paced role, finding purpose anew.
But not everyone can step onto this path—not by will alone. Severe brain injury might sap the cognitive reserves needed for adaptation, while geography—a rural home far from a clinic—or lack of funds might halt momentum before it starts. The grey slips in here: change is hard, and for some, it’s a door that stays locked. We meet them where they stand, with patience and realism.
The Weight of Stillness: Holding Still and Its Toll
Stillness is the other side—the pause that comes, sometimes chosen, sometimes inevitable. It’s the patient who skips sessions, the family hesitant to adopt new tools, or the individual who lingers at a plateau because the climb feels too steep. The cost is tangible. Emotionally, it can bring a creeping sense of loss—Turner-Stokes et al. (2005) tie this stillness to lower mood and life satisfaction. Functionally, unused skills fade—a mind unchallenged forgets its cues, a voice unpracticed grows quiet. Socially, it isolates—imagine someone who stops trying to join conversations, drifting from those they love.
Worse, stillness can exact a steeper price if it lingers too long. Brain injury recovery hinges on timing—neuroplasticity’s window is widest early on (Kleim & Jones, 2008). Delay—whether from reluctance, denial, or barriers like no therapy access—can shrink what’s possible. A patient who waits years to engage might miss the chance to restore function or adapt to the heights intense early therapy could have reached. Picture someone post-stroke: early, aggressive work might rebuild speech, but years of stillness could leave it a whisper, the neural pathways too set to shift. It’s a sobering reality, not for every case, but one we can’t ignore.
Still, stillness isn’t forever for all. Some rest there, then stir. Imagine a woman refusing help for months after her brain injury, overwhelmed, until a daughter’s encouragement nudges her toward a planner that changes her days. Research echoes this—early disengagement doesn’t always doom recovery (Turner-Stokes et al., 2005). It’s a phase, a gathering of strength, not a fixed state. But the grey persists—standing still is hard too, especially when it’s not a choice. Anosognosia might blind someone to their needs, or practical barriers like cost or distance might hold them still. For these patients, the weight isn’t optional; it’s a reality we work to ease.
The Grey Space: Effort, Constraint, and Time
This is the heart of it—the grey expanse where effort and limitation tangle. A patient’s course hinges on so much: the depth of their brain injury (a mild concussion vs. a severe stroke), their grit before the injury, their support network, and when we reach them. Consider two patients, both with brain injuries from strokes. One, a woman in her 50s, dives into a memory app, her shaky entries becoming confident notes over a year, linking her back to her family. The other, a man in a rural stretch, stays still—fatigue and no nearby clinic keep him there. But even he shifts later, a home visit sparking small steps forward.
Evidence lights the way here. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) offers insight—Hayes et al. (2011) suggest that embracing limits can pave the way for action. That woman with the app first had to accept her memory wouldn’t fully return. The Transtheoretical Model (Prochaska & DiClemente, 1983) adds depth—patients move through readiness stages, from not considering change to taking steps, often circling back before advancing. Some need time in stillness to build toward change, and that’s not a flaw—it’s human.
Clinical Takeaways
Our role is to stand in this grey with them, discerning who can push forward and who’s held back, then tailoring our approach. Assessment comes first—motivational interviewing (Miller & Rollnick, 2013) can uncover where someone sits. Is Sarah with the app ready to try, or still mourning what’s gone? For those who can move, frame change as bitesized—ACT’s focus on valued action helps, tying effort to meaning, like using a tool to call a grandchild. Self-efficacy research (Bandura, 1997) shows these small wins build momentum.
For those still, patience is key. It’s a stage, not an end—ACT reminds us acceptance can spark later shifts, and some patients pivot years in, when the moment aligns. But we must flag the risk: prolonged stillness can close doors, so where possible, we nudge early, gently, before time hardens the path. When change stalls—say, a brain injury too profound for big gains—shift gears. Bandura’s work nudges us toward mastery within reach, like confidence in a simplified routine over an impossible leap. It’s about possibility, not pressure.
Conclusion
Think of Sarah again, eyeing that app. A year on, she might be tapping out reminders with ease, or still hesitant, but with potential simmering. Change is hard, so is standing still—they flow. The work of change eases over time—cognitively as skills settle, emotionally as peace grows. Stillness, too, can lift—a quiet today might bloom tomorrow, though for some, waiting risks a heavier cost. Rehab is a long story, and we’re the companions. With neuroplasticity’s promise, ACT’s grounding, and readiness models, we guide patients through the grey—toward change where it’s there, toward calm where it’s not. To my colleagues: keep listening, keep nudging, and trust the unfolding.
Recent Comments